A legal agent reads contracts and document sets, flags clauses that depart from positions your firm has already agreed, finds provisions across large volumes of paper, and tracks dates, with every output pointing at the exact clause it came from.

First pass contract review is expensive because it is slow and repetitive, not because it is difficult. Somebody reads forty pages to find the four clauses that differ from what your firm normally accepts.

The same is true of finding every change of control provision across two hundred agreements during due diligence, or noticing that a notice period expires in eleven days.

An agent does the reading and points at the clause. What it will not do is tell you what the clause means for your client, because that is legal advice and it belongs to a person admitted to practise.

Why these agents cite and never conclude

Duara builds legal agents from Nairobi for law firms and in house counsel who spend billable or scarce hours on first pass review that a machine could narrow.

We build these to cite, never to conclude. An output that summarises a contract without pointing at the clause is useless to a lawyer, because the first thing any competent lawyer does is check it, and a summary that cannot be checked simply gets read twice.

Who this is for

  • First pass review eats junior time
  • Due diligence means reading hundreds of agreements
  • Deadlines are tracked in a spreadsheet
  • Your positions live in a partner head rather than a playbook

Industries we serve

  • Law firms
  • In house legal teams
  • Corporate secretarial services
  • Banking legal departments
  • Insurance legal teams
  • Property and conveyancing

Problems this solves

These are volume problems rather than difficulty problems, which is exactly what makes them worth narrowing.

What we deliver

Contract review against your own documented positions, clause level search across document sets, date extraction and tracking, and a citation behind every single output.

First pass review against your firm playbook

Clause level search across large document sets

Extraction of dates, parties and obligations

Deadline tracking with advance warning

A citation to the exact clause behind every output

A written playbook where none currently exists

Features

Benefits

  • First pass narrows sharply. Reading forty pages becomes reviewing four flagged clauses with the source in front of you.
  • Due diligence stops being a headcount problem. Volume search removes the mechanical portion, leaving the judgement to lawyers.
  • Consistency across juniors. A written playbook means two juniors reach the same position on the same clause.
  • Deadlines stop depending on a spreadsheet. Notice periods and renewals warn in advance rather than being noticed late.

Technologies we use

Citation integrity is the whole engineering problem. A legal output that cannot be traced to a clause is not a time saving, it is a second reading.

How the process works, step by step

A legal agent usually takes six to eight weeks, and the playbook work is normally the longest part.

  1. Step 1

    Free review of your workflow

    We establish where lawyer time actually goes and which of it is reading rather than judging.

  2. Step 2

    Playbook written

    Your positions are documented, which is often the first time they have existed outside a partner head.

  3. Step 3

    Calibration on closed matters

    The agent runs against contracts your team has already reviewed, so its flags are compared to known answers.

  4. Step 4

    Assisted review

    Lawyers review with the agent flagging, and disagreements refine the playbook rather than the reverse.

  5. Step 5

    Volume work added

    Due diligence search and deadline tracking follow once review flags are trusted.

Quality assurance and how we work

The commitments attached to a system used in legal work.

Does it give legal advice?

No. It reports that a clause departs from your documented position. What that means for a client is advice and belongs to a person admitted to practise.

Can we rely on what it flags?

Check the citation, which is why every flag points at the exact clause. It narrows the reading, it does not replace the lawyer.

What if it misses a clause?

Calibration on closed matters is designed to find exactly that, and we report misses rather than tuning them quietly away.

Is client material confidential?

Yes. Privileged documents stay within your systems and are never sent to a public model for training.

What is a playbook?

A written record of positions your firm will and will not accept. Most firms have the positions and not the document.

What if we do not have one?

We write it with you, and firms frequently find this the more valuable half of the work regardless of the software.

Does it handle Kenyan law?

It reads your documents against your positions. It does not opine on Kenyan law, and any output requiring legal knowledge stays with your lawyers.

Can it search across many agreements?

Yes, which is the purely mechanical portion of due diligence and where volume savings are largest.

Does it draft contracts?

It can produce drafts from your own templates. Drafting judgement, negotiation and final wording stay with lawyers.

How does it handle different drafting styles?

It identifies provisions by what they do rather than by fixed wording, which is necessary since no two firms draft identically.

How long before it is useful?

Six to eight weeks, with the playbook work normally taking longer than the software.

Can it track deadlines?

Yes, extracting notice periods and renewal dates and warning in advance rather than relying on a spreadsheet being opened.

Will juniors stop learning review?

That is a real risk and worth managing. Most firms keep juniors reviewing with the agent flagging rather than removing them from the work.

Can it compare two versions of a contract?

Yes, and it flags substantive changes rather than every formatting difference.

Does it work on scanned documents?

Yes, though quality affects reliability, and we report where a scan was too poor to read confidently rather than guessing.

Can in house teams use it?

Yes, and in house teams often gain most because their volume is high and their headcount is fixed.

What if lawyers disagree with a flag?

The playbook is refined rather than the lawyer overruled. Disagreement usually means the written position was imprecise.

Does it handle documents in Swahili?

It can, though the majority of commercial drafting we see is in English, and we test on your actual documents before committing.

Who is responsible for an error?

Your lawyers, as they are now. The agent narrows reading and cites sources. It does not carry professional responsibility and we do not suggest otherwise.

What does document review cost per matter?

Document volume and page count determine it, quoted against your own matter figures before anything is agreed.

Glossary of terms

Terms used around document review.

Playbook
A written record of the positions a firm will and will not accept on common clauses.
First pass review
The initial read of a contract to identify what needs a lawyer attention.
Due diligence
Systematic review of a counterparty documents before a transaction.
Clause extraction
Locating and pulling out provisions of a particular type across documents.
Citation
The pointer from an output back to the exact clause supporting it.
Notice period
The time a party must give before terminating or renewing, commonly missed when tracked manually.